• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About

City Pleasures

Theater - Food - Music in Chicago

  • Contact

Ishida Exhibit Exposes the Other in Us All

October 14, 2019 by Mitchell Oldham

Awakening, 1998 @ Tetsuya Ishida, 2019 – Photography Takemi Art Publishing

Even with the staggering number of choices Chicagoans have to satisfy our cravings for music, theater, dance and the visual arts, the entertainment playing field can never get too crowded.  Having only been open a year, the city may be just beginning to realize what an asset Wrightwood 659 has already become.  The sedately serene Lincoln Park gallery’s current exhibition, Tetsuya Ishida:  Self Portrait of Other, is so exceptional that it doesn’t stop at just being art. 

The hope of every artist is to not only communicate their vision of the world; but to also make a comment about it.  Each of the 70 paintings in the Self Portrait of Other exhibit is that kind of dialog.  In many ways, the messages are so brazen they could be considered assaultive.  And it’s the message that people respond to first.  Curiosity helps you see and appreciate the art that drives and supports the artist’s visual commentary.

Contact, 1998 © Tetsuya Ishida, 2019 – Photography Takemi Art Publishing

Even though it’s impossible to decipher the absolute source of Ishida’s angst, the pain found in many of his works is the most declarative thing about them.  For some viewers, that’s where their journey with Ishida may stop as they examine repeated images of melancholy overlaid on a highly mechanized relentlessly conformist world. 

Seeing the show in its entirety dispels that singularity.  Estimates vary on the number of paintings Ishida completed.  The official number, corroborated by his brother, Michiaki Ishida  and gallerist, Yumie Wada, stands at 180. Most if not all of them done after his art studies at Musashino Art University.  He may well have been influenced by the work of Ben Shaun, a prominent social realist painter whose work often carried a distinct message of protest.  Shaun’s series of paintings capturing the environmental and human costs of the U.S.’s thermonuclear tests in the Bikini Atoll received global attention.  Those tests had fatal consequences for a small Japanese fishing boat from Ishida’s small hometown on the country’s coast. Ishida saw the images as a child and it’s even claimed that later in his life he said that Shaun’s work inspired him to pursue art.  The paintings and sketches could easily induce fearfulness; especially in the young, which gives credence to his brother’s statement that he feels there is a lot of fear in Tetsuya’s art.  The influence of anime and other Japanese cartoon formats are easily found in his art as well.   

Tetsuya Ishida surrounded by his art work photographer unknown

But the times in which an artist lives can also heavily impact their output, as it did with Ishida. Born in 1973, he came of age when Japan, once the innovation powerhouse of Asia and beacon of Asian prosperity, was facing the bleakest of economic reversals.  It’s as if the economy stopped and optimism about the future was obliterated.  Concentrated in the 90’s and known as the lost decade, the heaviest toll fell on the young who felt unneeded and futureless.  The collective shock caused many thousands of them to turn inward; or in extreme cases, completely shut themselves away from the world. 

After art school, Ishida was among the struggling.  He worked at a print shop and as a security guard.  But his devotion to his art never waned allowing him to produce roughly 18 works a year until his death in 2005 at 31.  When considering the amount of precision and detail invested in most of his paintings, that modest number seems remarkably high.  Letting your eyes roam over a work like Recalled (1998), where a man lies disassembled in a box like a high value commodity with people surrounding him as if in ritual, will expose that meticulousness.  A beautiful woven tatami mat used as the flooring for the scene takes up much of the large canvas.  Like so many of Ishida’s works, the painting is subtly spellbinding.  Slowly you notice the elaborate detail needed to execute this wonder; with its exquisite brushwork and celestial sense of color extending down to that tatami mat.  Or Search (2001), the only work that Ishida received notable recognition for, and the validation that goes with it, while he was living.  It’s an oddly un-playful painting given the context.  An extravagantly detailed train set, with a realistic landscape of tree covered hills at its center, sits on display before a large sunny window.  But there’s a human form in the middle of the scene.  Lying in a fetal position, it looks as if his body is in transformation, becoming a part of the train set’s topography.  The human form is frequently altered in Ishida’s worlds.  Usually he uses only the face and places it on the front of airplanes, protruding out of building’s, or on the heads of insects.  But he can also reimagine the entire body as he does here.  A look of incomparable benevolence covers the man’s face.  Search becomes another transfixing scene that defies convenient interpretation but worthy of endless appreciation. Again, careful thought is invested in every object on the canvas.  It’s impossible not to marvel at the conceptual composition or the beauty of his technique.

Recalled, 1998 photography City Pleasures

The Ishida retrospective has only two showing worldwide.  The first held in Madrid’s grand Palacio de Velazquez just closed in September before opening here in Chicago on October 3rd .  Thanks to curators at Wrightwood 659, we should once again count ourselves fortunate.   The opportunity to see how one extremely gifted artist represents the world he knows through the unsettling lens of a generation without a vision of hope is rare.  Oceans of ink have been used to express the same sentiments in text.  Ishida’s art gives that message infinitely more power. 

Search, 2001 photography City Pleasures

Gratefully the retrospective, displaying nearly half of the artist’s total production, includes both his earliest work in addition to paintings he completed at the end of his tragically short nine year career.  It’s startling to see his skills as an artist grow in the span of a few years.  How he came to insert nuances of difference and subtlety to what we initially see as the same facial expression.  

Teresa Velázquez, Head of Exhibitions of Spain’s Museo Nacional Centro Arte, pointed out that Madrid’s Palacio de Velazquez is an imposing and opulent structure inside and out.  Wrightwood 659 was designed for contemplation and intimacy.  The perfect environment for enjoying beauty.  You can walk up to a painting and get close enough to sink inside and explore. The paintings in the Ishida exhibition provide lots of opportunity for that.  You’ll likely walk away with as many revelations as questions.

Decided By Myself, 1999 photography City Pleasures

The size of the exhibit provides enough sweep to expose the thematic richness that Ishida may not be getting enough credit for.  His take on corporate acquiescence in his 1996 Toyota Ipsum could be considered derisive.  Stepping up his attack on the status quo to acts of defilement in an untitled 2001 piece, where a row of young office workers with mountains of hurt and anger in their eyes collectively sit spoiling office equipment seems hardly an expression of resignation. In Abortion (2004), a young woman lies on a narrow bed with her back to you.  A young man sits on the side of the bed, eyes down.  It’s a solemn and personal scene and the fact that the bed straddles what looks to be a dry stream bed is peculiar.  And then the eye falls to a small blue object lying on the ground directly in front of the man that will likely cause you to silently gasp. 

Abortion, 2004 photography City Pleasures

Ishida had a lot to say about a lot of things.  He had also hoped to leave Japan.  Wondering how doing so would have affected his art is of course futile.   That we can at least see how his vision, message and talent manifested into astonishingly memorable art, even through a small decade long window, is still a wonderful gift.

Tetsuya Ishida:  Self-Portrait of Other

October 3 – December 14, 2019

Wrightwood 659

659 W. Wrightwood Ave.

Chicago, IL    60614

773-437-6601

www.wrightwood659.org

Filed Under: Trollin' Adventures

Primary Sidebar

Performance

Show Your Gratitude to Chicago’s Arts Community

March 28, 2020 By Mitchell Oldham

2400 Block of Estes Ave. – Chicago – photo City Pleasures

The impact of the coronavirus has unalterably reached into the lives of everyone and shown us of our common vulnerability.  We will rise from the withering blow it’s dealt to our spirits and to the way we are accustomed to living our lives.  

This crisis, like most hardships, does not encroach and disrupt our lives equally.   One’s age, calling, income, zip code and profession all determine how deeply the ramifications of the epidemic affect you. 

City Pleasures covers the arts community.  Actors, dancers, musicians and the venues that showcase their talent are being devastated by their inability to either practice their craft or feature artistic talent.  Because they need our help, City Pleasures is sharing ways that allow anyone financially capable to provide support to do so.  Some of those channels extend beyond the arts and entertainment community by design and list opportunities to also contribute needed relief to Chicago neighborhoods and the most vulnerable.

There are several ways to support the theater community.  Individual theater companies as well as all non-profit arts organization accept support through direct donations, the purchase of a ticket, gift cards or subscriptions.  The homepage of your favorite theater or theaters will direct you on how to do so.

If you would like your contributions to be broad based, the City of Chicago and the United Way of Metro Chicago have launched the Chicago Community Covid-19 Response Fund “to unite the funds raised by Chicago’s philanthropies, corporations and individuals to be disbursed to nonprofit organizations across the region”, including those in the arts. 

Click here to donate:  https://www.chicagocovid19responsefund.org/

One Chicago entertainment institution’s Training Center is taking comedy to the clouds by offering classes online. To find out more about or enroll in Second City’s comedy at home lessons, visit:   https://www.secondcity.com/comedyfromyourcouch.   Areas of focus include “Creating and Pitching Your TV Series”, “Teen Standup” and “Voiceover 101”.

Day of Absence, Refreshed and Brilliant at VG

March 6, 2020 By Mitchell Oldham

Sonya Madrigal, Ann Joseph, Bryant Hayes – Jazmyne Fountain photography

When Douglas Turner Ward wrote his pioneering one act play, Day of Absence, in 1965; he had a very clear intent.  He wanted to write a play exclusively for a black audience.  An audience that did not then exist. He was also working with a highly specific set of objectives.  Expectedly, he wanted to write a play that spoke to the lives black people lived, but he also aimed to create a work that was implicit and allowed his audience to fill in the blanks.  One that was subtle and edged with fine threads of sophistication.  And just as importantly, he wanted to write something that did not put his audience to sleep.

He came up with two plays, both in one acts, Happy Ending and Day of Absence that played simultaneously at the St. Mark’s Playhouse in New York.  Both plays grew legs and are regularly reprised on the contemporary stage. 

Douglas Turner Ward – photo courtesy WNYC

When they were originally created 55 years ago, Ward also had to track down and recruit an audience by going anywhere the black public gathered; social clubs, union halls, beauty shops to rustle them up.  His tactic worked and the productions played over 500 shows at the St. Mark’s. 

Congo Square is only presenting Day of Absence on Victory Garden’s Christiansen stage right now.  And as wonderful as it is, the current production won’t be running as long as it did when the play debuted back in ‘65.   Making it even more of a must see. Even today it’s startling to see what Ward did with this jewel.  A spare play with very few props, Day of Absence, like any top-tier theatrical creation intended for live performance, thrives on a gleaming story and fantastic characters.  And it achieves everything Ward originally hoped to accomplish plus. 

Taking an approach that says, “We know how you see us, now let us show you how we see you”, Day of Absence is all about reversals and looking at the world through different eyes.  Normally, the cast is all Black.  But this updated adaptation broadens what “black” is by making it anyone not white; resulting in cast made up of both brown and black performers.

Kelvin Roston Jr and Ronald L. Conner – Jazmyne Fountain photography

The overriding constant is that the play is still performed in white face, (and lots of wigs) with minorities portraying whites in a small southern town.

Opening quietly, a couple of regular guys working in a mall are just getting their day started. Luke (Ronald L. Conner) and Clem (Kelvin Roster, Jr.) share small talk southern style and toss shout outs to regulars as they peruse the routine landscape of their work lives.  Clem’s older and Teddy Bear homey, Luke’s younger, gruffer and lost in his cell phone.  It takes a minute or two, more like several, but Clem finally picks up on something.  Something that’s not quite right or out of kilter.  Suddenly stricken, he realizes he hasn’t seen a black person all day.  Half the population.  Luke’s slower to accept something that ridiculous.  Until he can’t do otherwise. 

Jordan Arredondo, Meagan Dilworth – Jazmyne Fountain photography

Performed as satire, Day of Absence chronicles what happens when a constant of life disappears.  One that you may take for granted, resignedly tolerate or even benignly dismiss depending on your mood.  More interestingly, it’s a story about how people react.  What do they say and do in what quickly escalates into crisis and chaos. 

Anthony Irons directed the production and achieved a master stroke by having his characters, or more precisely his characterizations, vie with the plot for overall strength.  The way Ronald Conner portrays nonchalant insouciance is about as winning as it gets.  Later we find him equally transfixing playing a completely different role.  Roston, with his delicious phrasing and the pitch perfect softness of his drawl, is just as effective as Clem.

Ronald L. Conner, Ann Joseph – photo Jazmyne Fountain

The action streams briskly through three backdrops.  The mall, John and Mary’s bedroom and the mayor’s office.  John (Jordan Arredondo) and Mary (Meagan Dilworth) make their discovery of the vanishing rudely when their new born wails plaintively through the night and there’s no one to tend to it.  There’s no Kiki, no Black three-in-one, nursemaid housemaid cook, to intervene and relieve the stress of parenthood.    Dilworth’s Mary is so preciously inept at doing anything useful you’re tempted to feel sorry for her.  But that sympathy would be horribly misplaced.  Dilworth still makes a splendid Mary whose only skill is to function as a household “decoration”.  Arredondo as her husband fills his role to the brim with manly character and pragmatism.  When he valiantly volunteers to go the hood to look for Kiki and finds nothing short of a ghost town where “not even a little black dog” could be sighted, he’s all business and entitled indignation.

Ward created the consummate repository for the town’s angst and ire in the mayor.  And director Irons knew exactly how to shape the character as an unforgettable foil. Unflappable and supremely confident, the mayor’s sense of privilege and the power she insinuates take on regal dimensions.  In the right hands and under the right direction, it’s a fantastic role and one that Ann Joseph fills beautifully.  Ordinarily a male actor plays the part and Jackson is the last name of his female personal assistant/secretary/gopher.   Here Jackson is the second role Mr. Conner inhabits so vividly and with so much virtuosity.  Always on point and a bit self-consciously effete, he’s deferential to a fault and ever vigilant about watching his own back.

Ward shrewdly built a lot of humor into the play.  And this effort takes advantage of every morsel.  It even adds more zest causing the whole affair to frequently tip over into the hilarious.   The perfume skit alone deserves its own baby Tony award.  Despite the outright comedy, the underlying subtext couldn’t be more biting.  Bryant Hayes as Clan and Kelvin Roston, Jr. in his dual role as Rev. Pious represent the true demons Ward is battling in his lasting contribution to the American stage.

This adaptation, cleverly updated with the playwright’s permission, makes it shine like new money.  

Day of Absence

Through March 27, 2020

Victory Gardens Theater

2433 N. Lincoln Ave.

773-871-3000

www.congosquaretheatre.com

A Fiery Birthday with the Boys

February 25, 2020 By Mitchell Oldham

William Marquez, Kyle Patrick, Sam Bell Gurwitz, Denzel Tsopnang in Windy City Playhouse’s Boys in the Band, photo credit Michael Brosilow

Time and a change of perspective can allow you to appreciate things you once abhorred. That maxim can be true of many things.  Music, art, food.  People.  It was true of Boys in the Band.  When Mart Crowley’s 1968 bombshell of a play rolled out on celluloid in 1970, it rightfully caused the world to shutter.  Never had anyone so boldly pulled back the curtain to reveal the inner-life of the dispossessed as vividly or as candidly as Mr. Crowley had done.  Now celebrating its 50th anniversary, people are still wondering how accurate his painful picture of gay life is.    

Having recently experienced the very fine Windy City Playhouse immersive take on the play, there’s no doubt many will be wondering the same thing 50 years from now.

The cast of Windy City Playhouse’s The Boys in the Band, photo credit Michael Brosilow

Listening to Mr. Crowley talk about how he came to write his landmark; how he was broke, out of work, without prospects and angry, the cathartic aura surrounding the play was finally given a cause.  Still, because you don’t expect friendship to take on such ruthlessly hurtful dimensions, those explanations don’t satisfy the question of intensity or the depths of some the play’s caustic plunges.

William Boles scenic design played a key role in helping to provide the audience a tactile understanding of the times, place and people at this dark birthday party Michael (Jackson Evans) was throwing for his newly 32-year-old best friend Harold.  Ushered six at a time through a tastefully appointed residential lobby and taken up the pretend elevator to the 5th floor, the audience enters Michael’s resplendent apartment as if they themselves were guests.  The party hadn’t started.  Michael wasn’t there.  You could walk around and admire his beautiful spirit decanters.  The lovely artistic touches.  The drama of the sunken conversation pit.  70s chic at its highest.   All in deep red with accents in gold and in blue. The room radiated not only success, but power.

The set of Windy City Playhouse’s The Boys in the Band, photo credit Michael Brosilow

After everyone’s settled, Michael sweeps in doing last minute party preparation things.  Putting the food out and the music on.  You notice that even when the first guest, Donald (Jordan Dell Harris) arrives, things aren’t particularly warm.  Nor are you immediately clear on Michael and Donald’s relationship.  They’re more than just friends but not exactly lovers either?  And even though Donald’s sparring skills are impressive, Michael seems to take pleasure in baiting him with petty criticism.  Everyone else flows in shortly after Donald goes up to change.  Emory (William Marquez) and Bernard (Denzel Tsopnang) arrive together.  Lovers Larry (James Lee) and Hank (Ryan Reilly) are carrying the vestiges of a something bitter between them into the party.  It’s a spat that will continue to swell throughout the play.  Then Harold’s birthday present gets there much too early.  A prostitute, Cowboy is as dull witted as he is beautiful.  Even though he’s taunted by nearly everyone for his lack of intelligence, he’s also silently envied for his physical exceptionalism.  And there’s a straight outlier in the mix.  Michael’s close friend from college, back in a time when he was still in the closet, was in town and needed to see him.  So much so that he wept with desperation when talking to Michael on the phone.  Not being able to dissuade him, Michael invited Alan (Christian Edwin Cook) to the party as well, hoping to somehow camouflage the party’s gay complexion.

Christian Edwin Cook as Alan in Windy City Playhouse’s production of The Boys in the Band, photo credit- Michael Brosilow

The dynamics of the party are already roiling by the time he shows up.  Emory is being quintessential Emory.  So gay.  Not defiantly; more in a liberation of self sort of way.  His racial digs at Bernard, the only Black member of the party, were unsurprisingly catty but very curious.  Were these swipes supposed to be expressions of the times are something else?   Marquez made a splendid Emory.  Later, when he apologized to Bernard for his callousness, promising not to cause such conscious hurt in the future, he was contrite enough and sincere enough to be ingratiatingly convincing.  Which highlights one of key joys of the play; it’s exceptional casting.  The spat that would not die between Hank and Larry centered on Larry’s inability, in fact his refusal, to be faithful to Hank; who had left his wife and children to be with him.  Both James Lee as Larry and Ryan Reilly as Hank deliver a lot of honesty in their portrayals of what two people, who genuinely love one another, are willing to sacrifice to conquer an imposing barrier together. 

Denzel Tsopnang, William Marquez, James Lee and Jackson Evans in Windy City Playhouse’s The Boys in the Band, photo credit Michael Brosilow

Christian Edwin Cook’s characterization of Alan, Michael’s straight friend, proved the most surprising because of the voice director Carl Menninger chose for him to use.  He spoke with the diction and phrasing characteristic of blue bloods in the era when the Carnegies and Vanderbilts were flying high.  His speech alone set him apart from everyone else at the party.  Emory’s effeminacy however brought out his bile and even pushed him to violence.  His punishment:  he must remain at the party. 

Unfortunately, Tsopnang’s Bernard was the least developed of the eight central characters.  When Michael comes up with his insidious parlor game of calling the person you’ve always in your heart-of-hearts truly loved, and telling them your feelings for them, Bernard’s the first to gamely take up the challenge.  It was only then did we catch a tiny glimpse of his inner core.   By this time, everybody had had enough liquid courage to consider doing something so exposing and so ripe for humiliation.  Who Bernard chose to call was also marked by the kind of class and race disparities that shout futility. 

Jackson Evans and WIlliam Marquez in Windy City Playhouse’s The Boys in the Band, photo credit Michael Brosilow

Harold (Sam Bell-Gurvitz) had grandly made his infamous “32-year-old, ugly, pock marked Jew fairy” entrance by the time the game was in full swing.  Despite it ushering in the possibility of something positive for Larry and Hank, as it continues, the game seems to dredge up nothing but pain.  Michael’s adamancy about playing it turns pathological when you realize he’s the only one not drunk.  He’s been on the wagon for five weeks and therefore without an excuse for insisting that everyone take this wanton drive off a cliff.  When it back fires, sorrow for him does not exist.  And when he makes his plea like statement, “If we could just not hate ourselves so much”, you wonder why he doesn’t just direct that question to himself. 

Stonewall happened just one year after The Boys in the Band premiered off Broadway.  Led by a fistful of outraged fed-up drag queens, another landmark, gay pride, was born.  It’s fascinating to look at these two milestones side by side.  Whether you consider them a “before and after” or a continuum, they both are about community; with all the complexity the word embodies. 

Under Mr. Menninger’s enlightened direction, and mounted on Mr. Boles sensational set, Windy City’s staging of The Boys in the Band has proven a highpoint in the theater season.  It’s also an ideal example of how well an immersive approach to theater aids in fully absorbing a captivating story.

The Boys in the Band

Through April 19th, 2020

Windy City Playhouse

3014 Irving Park Rd.

Chicago, IL   60618

windycityplayhouse.com

Follow Us Online

  • Facebook

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in